laugardagur, apríl 26, 2003

Ja, ekki er nú öll vitleysan eins, nei sum er bara hreint út sagt mun vitlausari....

Þessi grein vakti athygli mína enda ekki í fyrsta skipti sem ég heyri hana, svipaða frásögn er að finna á þætti Michael Moore the awful truth. En ekki það, ég samhryggist viðkomandi fyrirtæki ekki neitt að þurfa aðeins að borga fyrir allt þetta vesen hjá manninum, ég get fengið flog þegar ég er að díla við hluti eins og félagsþjónustuna (já ég er í Sjálfsstæðisflokknum, og já ég hélt að flokksskírteinið mitt sæi til þess að ég þyrfti ekki á þeim að halda. Kannski er bara mál til komið að reyna að tjösla því saman eftir að ég hengdi það sem brandara á ísskápinn minn). Það er eitthvað alveg ótrúlega skelfilegt við að þurfa að hlaupa á milli stofnana, fá aldrei sömu svörin og engin trúir því að ég hafi fengið vitlausar upplýsingar...... ég gæti orðið geggjaður, en aftur að sögunni.

Þetta er fyndið:

The Price of Stupidity

What a world? (country NSW)... On Thursday, 24 January 2002, Derek Guille
broadcast this story on his afternoon program on ABC radio.

In March, 1999, a man living in Kandos (near Mudgee in NSW) received a bill
for his as yet unused gas line stating that he owed $0.00. He ignored it and
threw it away. In April he received another bill and threw that one away
too.

The following month the gas company sent him a very nasty note stating they
were going to cancel his gas line if he didn't send them $0.00 by return
mail. He called them, talked to them, and they said it was a computer error
and they would take care of it.

The following month he decided that it was about time that he tried out the
troublesome gas line figuring that if there as usage on the account it would
put an end to this ridiculous predicament. However, when he went to use the
gas, it had been cut off. He called the gas company who apologised for the
computer error once again and said that they would take care of it. The next
day he got a bill for $0.00 stating that payment was now overdue.

Assuming that having spoken to them the previous day the latest bill was yet
another mistake, so he ignored it, trusting that the company would be as
good as their word and sort the problem out.

The next month he got a bill for $0.00. This bill also stated that he had 10
days to pay his account or the company would have to take steps to recover
the debt.

Finally, giving in, he thought he would beat the company at their own game
and mailed them a cheque for $0.00. The computer duly processed his account
and returned a statement to the effect that he now owed the gas company
nothing at all.

A week later, the manager of the Mudgee branch of the Westpac Banking
Corporation called our hapless friend and asked him what he was doing
writing cheque for $0.00. After a lengthy explanation the bank manager
replied that the $0.00 cheque had caused their cheque processing software to
fail. The bank could therefore not process ANY cheques they had received
from ANY of their customers that day because the cheque for $0.00 had caused
the computer to crash.

The following month the man received a letter from the gas company claiming
that his cheque has bounced and that he now owed them $0.00 and unless he
sent a cheque by return mail they would take immediate steps to recover the
debt. At this point, the man decided to file a debt harassment claim against
the gas company. >>
It took him nearly 2 hours to convince the clerks at the local courthouse
that he was not joking. They subsequently assisted him in the drafting of
statements which were considered substantive evidence of the aggravation and
difficulties he had been forced to endure during this debacle. The matter
was heard in the Magistrate's Court in Mudgee and the outcome was this:

The gas company was ordered to:

[1] Immediately rectify their computerised accounts system or show cause,
within 10 days, why the matter should not be referred to a higher court for
consideration under company Law.

[2] Pay the bank dishonour fees incurred by the man.

[3] Pay the bank dishonour fees incurred by all the Westpac clients whose
cheques had been bounced on the day our friend's had been.

[4] Pay the claimant's court costs; and

[5] Pay the claimant a total of $1500 per month for the 5
month period March to July inclusive as compensation for the aggravation
they had caused their client to suffer.

And all this over $0.00.

Engin ummæli: